Stephen Colbert Trashes The Supreme Court’s 14th Amendment Logic

Politics

Stephen Colbert exposed the holes in the Supreme Court’s 14th Amendment logic with a single joke.

Colbert said:

.The justices claim that since different states have different standards for what would qualify as insurrection, conflicting state outcomes would lead to chaos. Yes, the Supreme Court knows you can’t just let states decide who goes on their ballots. States are too busy deciding that life begins in the freezer section. Next to the pearl onions. You know. Life. So. Anyway,

Here’s the SCOTUS  rationale. The majority says that disqualifying a candidate for congress passes legislation. Okay, quick question. If congress does decide to pass that legislation to disqualify a candidate for insurrection, what if he sends his mob to storm congress to stop them from passing that legislation? Does that count as insurrection? Or do they have to pass more legislation about that before the next mob shows up? I’m just asking, because clearly you guys haven’t put any thought into any of this stuff. Okay, you gotta think it through. There’s steps.

To get more stories like this, subscribe to our newsletter The Daily.

Video:

Colbert is right. The Supreme Court is apparently living in a fantasy where Congress is capable of passing legislation. What would happen if Congress tried to pass legislation but a president sent a mob to the Capitol to block it?

It is almost as if January 6th never happened in the eyes of the Supreme Court.

The country needs to have the ability to disqualify insurrectionists before they get into power.

 

While the court was right, a patchwork solution would be inviting chaos, but expecting the current Congress to do anything is unrealistic.

When an insurrectionist can get around the SCOTUS remedy by staging an insurrection, it shows that the high court’s plan has more than a few holes in it.

A Special Message From PoliticusUSA

If you are in a position to donate purely to help us keep the doors open on PoliticusUSA during what is a critical election year, please do so here. 

We have been honored to be able to put your interests first for 14 years as we only answer to our readers and we will not compromise on that fundamental, core PoliticusUSA value.

Read original article here.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Trump attorneys trolled after they subpoena wrong Jeremy Rosenberg for hush money trial: ‘I’m keeping the $15’
US licence partner OSL eyes Ted Baker’s UK arm | Business News
1990s Men’s Fashion: Grunge, Sportswear & So Much More
The Hush Money Trial Witness List Is Trump Worst Living Nightmare
More than 40 people still stranded the day after a deadly cable car accident in Turkey