Clarence Thomas Minimized The 1/6 Insurrection During SCOTUS Arguments

Politics

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, whose wife was involved in the Trump plot to overturn the 2020, minimized the 1/6 insurrection during SCOTUS arguments.

The Supreme Court was hearing arguments related to the federal law about obstructing an official proceeding that has been used to charge 350 Trump insurrectionists.

Justice Clarence Thomas took it a step beyond and downplayed the insurrection:

Justice Thomas should not be hearing this case. He should be recused because he has a clear conflict of interest. Justice Thomas’s wife Ginni was involved in the plot to overturn the election. Ginni Thomas pressured election officials in states like Arizona to overturn the results.

Each time that Clarence Thomas violates basic ethic standards, the crisis of credibility at the Supreme Court grows.

A Special Message From PoliticusUSA

If you are in a position to donate purely to help us keep the doors open on PoliticusUSA during what is a critical election year, please do so here. 

We have been honored to be able to put your interests first for 14 years as we only answer to our readers and we will not compromise on that fundamental, core PoliticusUSA value.

Read original article here.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Dozens of whales die after 160 stranded in Western Australia | World News
28 Years Later Adds Ralph Fiennes, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, and Jodie Comer to Cast
Ireland pledging emergency legislation to send asylum seekers back to UK in wake of Rwanda bill being passed | World News
Part Two’ Cross $700M; ‘Godzilla x Kong’ $500M
Trump VP contender Kristi Noem defends dog killing amid ridicule