I’m Glad World War Z Is Getting A Sequel, But The Book Still Needs A Proper Adaptation

Entertainment


If I’m going to read the book at all, I’ll usually do it before I see the book-to-screen adaptation, but that didn’t happen with World War Z. I didn’t actually read Max Brooks’ 2006 novel, World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War, until years after Marc Forster’s adaptation starring Brad Pitt hit the big screen. I’d heard that the movie wasn’t a faithful adaptation of the original story, and book fans weren’t kidding. When I did finally read World War Z and learned firsthand just how different it is from the movie, I had no trouble understanding the frustration and ire that Brooks’ fans had over not getting a proper screen adaptation of his oral history-style zombie tale.

As Great As The Book Is, I Still Like The Movie

The film’s version of World War Z stars Brad Pitt as a former U.N. investigator who’s tasked with trying to solve the rapidly brewing crisis happening in the form of a zombie-like plague that’s wreaking havoc on every corner of the planet. Given the number of zombie-focused stories out there, I really like that this one centers on a pro-level problem-solver trying to get to the bottom of the situation before it’s too late (rather than the standard just-trying-to-survive tale we typically see).

Read original article here.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

British man missing after diving into Lake Como to rescue teenager
Trump Expresses Zero Sympathy For People Suffering Due To High Prices
Trump disclosure shows 1,100 July trades, Microsoft and Amazon sales
Tony Iommi Is the Riff Lord
Republicans Are In Full Disaster Mode And Starting To Break With Trump